A WAY BETTER VIDEO THAN EXPECTED
Some videos are pure secondhand embarrassment. People dancing alone in the street, rehearsing their viral moment while life just goes on around them. But every now and then, the universe throws in something unscripted — and it hits different.
Two girls dancing close together, locked into their routine, filming themselves at what looks like an outdoor party. Everything’s going according to plan: the poses, the moves, the camera looks. Then a guy walks right in front of them. One of the girls pushes him aside, like “get out of my TikTok.”
And just then — in the background — a fight breaks out.
They don’t notice. They keep dancing.
But behind them, punches are flying. One guy pushes another, then someone else jumps in, and eventually one of them goes down — straight onto the girls.
The choreo got wrecked, but the video?
Pure, accidental gold.
SpongeBob SquarePants.
MINUS TIMES MINUS EQUALS MORE. IF EVERYONE IS ARMED, NO ONE IS ARMED.Weapons create paradoxes that are hard to resolve. In a country where they’re legal, those who don’t carry one put themselves at a disadvantage against those who do. But if everyone is armed, no one dares to use theirs because they know the other person might shoot first. And yet, in a country where they’re banned, the only ones who have them are those who don’t follow the law, leaving everyone else as defenseless targets.
The theory says that arming the population creates balance, a game of deterrence where the risk of retaliation keeps guns holstered. But reality is far messier. Owning a gun, in itself, can push you to use it in situations where you otherwise never would have considered it. A misunderstanding, a pointless road rage incident, a moment of anger… and suddenly, pulling the trigger feels like an option.
If no one carries weapons, there’s no dilemma. If everyone does, the risk is always there but kept in check by mutual fear. And between these two extremes, the paradox remains: allowing guns means that those who don’t carry them are at risk, banning them means only those already outside the law will have them. So the real question is: which scenario would you rather live in?
# Watch Video
Instant Karma.
A LATINO, A WOMAN, AND A BLACK MANLet’s not forget that, according to woke philosophy, power abuse only happens from the top down. So, if three cops —a woman, a Latino, and another Black man— are beating you up, technically, it’s not abuse. There’s no privilege here, just diversity in action.
Relax, my friend, this isn’t aggression. It’s definitely not oppression. This is inclusion in its purest form.
# Watch video
I’ve never seen a bicycle kick done in real life