CHASING THE THIEF

I don't know if it is a settling of scores or a robbery where the victim or some good citizens intercept the thief. The point is that the end of the video is entirely unexpected.

Far from that place, some "thieves" try to steal the car of a family that leaves their land, but they did not count on the fact that the father of the family was also carrying a gun.

➡️ Let's do real, be real with Tantaly, the sex doll torso leader

ExtraBall by walter
Cute pussycat, pretty pussycat

ExtraBall2
(Clicking on these links daily you support ALRNCN's work. These are collaborations or sponsorships and, by visiting their sites, they like us even more)

THE CONTRACT THAT KEPT TYSON FROM THROWING HIS FAMOUS UPPERCUTS

The recent fight between Mike Tyson and Jake Paul has sparked a wave of rumors and speculation about its legitimacy. Some fans claim that Tyson, now 58 years old, was pressured to lose the fight in exchange for $20 million, arguing that he needed the money due to his financial situation. Reports suggest the existence of contractual clauses that banned body shots and uppercuts and would penalize Tyson if the fight didn’t go to the judges’ decision.

Additionally, there’s speculation that betting odds heavily favored Tyson, which, combined with pay-per-view revenue, sponsorships, and other earnings, might have influenced the fight’s outcome. Most bettors likely placed their money on Tyson, boosting betting profits in the event of his loss.

This video shows Tyson and Paul’s real skills during training sessions, suggesting that the contract might have played a role in Tyson’s performance during the fight.
Note: These claims are based on rumors and speculation, with no concrete evidence confirming the fight was fixed.



# Watch Video




ExtraBall
- I’m going to fuck you like no one ever has before!

ExtraBall2
(Clicking on these links daily you support ALRNCN's work. They're collaborators or sponsors and, by visiting their sites, they like us even more)

FIGHTS THAT LEAVE YOU WANTING MORE

Watching others fight attracts us because it triggers intense sensations and activates primitive instincts of survival and competition. We’re curious to see how conflicts are resolved, and they offer us a safe way to experience strong emotions without directly facing them.



# Watch video




ExtraBall
That old bastard. How he plays it off.

ExtraBall2
(Clicking on these links daily you support ALRNCN's work. They're collaborators or sponsors and, by visiting their sites, they like us even more)

SWAPPING THE RING FOR A BUS

We’ve seen it before: the “spectacle” of fights constantly trying to reinvent itself in this era of media and social overexposure. In the past, it was enough to do something different or innovative to stand out. But now, in a world flooded with endless content, one change isn’t enough; you need two or three more twists to truly grab anyone’s attention.

Creativity seems to have no limits: fights suspended meters above the ground, battles in pools, phone booths, and now, as in the video we’re looking at, fights inside public buses. It all boils down to the same goal: competing for those precious seconds of attention in a world where the extraordinary has become the norm.

The real question isn’t just how far they’ll go to grab your interest, but whether you, as a viewer, are still impressed—or if this endless quest for extremes has already lost its punch. Perhaps the real challenge isn’t in reinventing the stage but in finding a way to truly connect with an audience increasingly numb to the spectacle.



# Watch videos




ExtraBall
The day of their wedding.

ExtraBall2
(Clicking on these links daily you support ALRNCN's work. They're collaborators or sponsors and, by visiting their sites, they like us even more)

REINVENTING FIGHTS

Phone booths, swimming pools, buses... any place becomes an impromptu ring when someone decides it’s time to throw a few punches. It seems that when people get bored, creativity flourishes, and even fights adapt to new, often ridiculous, settings. From getting smacked around in the tight space of a phone booth to splashing punches in a pool, "innovation" finds its way into conflict. Because when boredom strikes, some people reinvent even the art of throwing down.



# Watch videos




ExtraBall
The slow-motion of the day.

ExtraBall2
(Clicking on these links daily you support ALRNCN's work. They're collaborators or sponsors and, by visiting their sites, they like us iaguapas2110n more)

BUT DON'T STAND THERE, MAN

In Southport, Liverpool, the town is confronting the police who are trying to stop the protests after a 17-year-old terrorist murdered 3 little girls and injured 6 others while they were in a dance class.
There are many videos of what's happening, but one stands out above the rest.



# Watch videos




ExtraBall
More humiliating than painful moments.

ExtraBall2
(Clicking on these links daily you support ALRNCN's work. They're collaborators or sponsors and, by visiting their sites, they like us even more)

MINUS TIMES MINUS EQUALS MORE. IF EVERYONE IS ARMED, NO ONE IS ARMED.

Weapons create paradoxes that are hard to resolve. In a country where they’re legal, those who don’t carry one put themselves at a disadvantage against those who do. But if everyone is armed, no one dares to use theirs because they know the other person might shoot first. And yet, in a country where they’re banned, the only ones who have them are those who don’t follow the law, leaving everyone else as defenseless targets.

The theory says that arming the population creates balance, a game of deterrence where the risk of retaliation keeps guns holstered. But reality is far messier. Owning a gun, in itself, can push you to use it in situations where you otherwise never would have considered it. A misunderstanding, a pointless road rage incident, a moment of anger… and suddenly, pulling the trigger feels like an option.

If no one carries weapons, there’s no dilemma. If everyone does, the risk is always there but kept in check by mutual fear. And between these two extremes, the paradox remains: allowing guns means that those who don’t carry them are at risk, banning them means only those already outside the law will have them. So the real question is: which scenario would you rather live in?



# Watch Video




ExtraBall
Instant Karma.

ExtraBall2
(Clicking on these links daily you support ALRNCN's work. They're collaborators or sponsors and, by visiting their sites, they like us even more)