WHO IS DOROBSHOKH NABOTOV AND WHY HAS HE GONE VIRALSometimes, life presents you with a unique opportunity, but to make the most of it, you have to be ready to seize it. The case of fighter Dorobshokh Nabotov at the UFC 308 conference, when Dana White was taking questions from the press, is a perfect example: Dorobshokh had the courage to step up at just the right moment, knowing he could be rejected or even ridiculed. Yet, he took the risk, and against all odds, the opportunity became a reality.
Dorobshokh Nabotov is a 25-year-old fighter from Tajikistan with a record of 9 wins and 0 losses. He boldly asked Dana White for a chance to fight in the UFC, and it appears Dana accepted the challenge. Have we just witnessed the beginning of a legend?
This situation reminds us that, even if things don’t always go our way, it’s crucial to keep trying. Most of the time, you might not get the answer you want, but that doesn’t mean you should give up. Each attempt is a lesson, preparing you for the moment when everything clicks into place. It’s perseverance that makes the difference, allowing you to seize those unexpected opportunities that only arise if you’re willing to take the leap and make a move.
It doesn’t matter how many times you feel you’ve failed; what’s important is not to stop trying. Success isn’t for those who wait passively but for those willing to take risks, stand in the line of fire, and keep going, regardless of past results. Because sometimes, life rewards the brave who refuse to quit and dare to do what others only dream of.
# Watch videos
The slow-motion of the day.
MINUS TIMES MINUS EQUALS MORE. IF EVERYONE IS ARMED, NO ONE IS ARMED.Weapons create paradoxes that are hard to resolve. In a country where they’re legal, those who don’t carry one put themselves at a disadvantage against those who do. But if everyone is armed, no one dares to use theirs because they know the other person might shoot first. And yet, in a country where they’re banned, the only ones who have them are those who don’t follow the law, leaving everyone else as defenseless targets.
The theory says that arming the population creates balance, a game of deterrence where the risk of retaliation keeps guns holstered. But reality is far messier. Owning a gun, in itself, can push you to use it in situations where you otherwise never would have considered it. A misunderstanding, a pointless road rage incident, a moment of anger… and suddenly, pulling the trigger feels like an option.
If no one carries weapons, there’s no dilemma. If everyone does, the risk is always there but kept in check by mutual fear. And between these two extremes, the paradox remains: allowing guns means that those who don’t carry them are at risk, banning them means only those already outside the law will have them. So the real question is: which scenario would you rather live in?
# Watch Video
Instant Karma.