THE NEW PANGEA
vikingo
There is a geological theory suggesting that in about 200-300 million years, the movement of tectonic plates will once again merge the current continents into a supercontinent, similar to what happened with Pangea around 300 million years ago.
This concept is part of the supercontinent cycle, where landmasses drift apart and reunite over hundreds of millions of years due to continental drift. Geologists have proposed several possible scenarios for this future supercontinent, with some of the most discussed being:
Pangea Proxima: A supercontinent that would form in the same region as the ancient Pangea.
Novopangea: Would emerge if the Atlantic continues to expand while the Pacific closes, pushing continents into a new union pattern.
Aurica: Would form if the Indian Ocean disappears and the current continents shift toward the equator.
Amasia: In this scenario, North America and Asia would merge near the North Pole.
Although this is an extremely slow process, scientists can predict it by measuring the movement of tectonic plates. So, if the planet is still standing in 250 million years, we might once again have a single continent.
However, while we can estimate with some accuracy how continents will move in 250 million years, predicting what humans will look like in that distant future is a whole different story. Unlike other species that evolve purely through natural selection, we’re playing god.
Technology has rewritten the rules. With genetic engineering, bionic implants, nanorobots, and the increasing fusion between biology and technology, natural evolution might take a back seat. Instead of slowly adapting to our environment, we might design our own enhancements, choosing how we want to be and what abilities we develop.
And it’s not just technology making predictions difficult—future environmental conditions are also an unknown. Will Earth remain habitable as we know it? Will we need to adapt to higher radiation levels? Will we live in underground megacities or even on other planets with entirely different atmospheres? Each scenario could push evolution in a completely different direction, like something out of Marvel’s multiverse.
Shall we take a walk?
THE GENDER PAY GAP EXPLAINED IN A SINGLE VIDEOdavid
We’ve all heard about the infamous "gender pay gap": that sinister conspiracy where men supposedly earn more "for doing exactly the same job," because obviously, the evil patriarchy just loves paying women less out of sheer cruelty, keeping them firmly under its thumb—despite the fact that this practice is literally illegal in almost every developed country.
But fine, let’s play along with that idea for a moment: men earn more ON AVERAGE than women, but honestly, have you ever stopped to think why men statistically take home higher salaries? Or do you just buy into it because it’s a mantra repeated endlessly? Maybe—just maybe—it’s because men are out there freezing their asses off on deep-sea fishing boats, getting tossed around by violent storms, handling chains heavier than your car, or sweating away on oil rigs and construction sites, risking their lives every single day. Perhaps it’s related to voluntarily choosing insanely dangerous, physically exhausting, and generally miserable jobs that pay better precisely because no sane person would do them willingly.
So yes, ladies and gentlemen, a pay gap certainly exists. And it seems firmly located in places where most people wouldn't set foot for a million dollars, let alone for 20 or 30 grand a month. But sure, go ahead and keep believing the gap is just the patriarchy flexing its muscles from comfy offices.
And this, dear friends, is the cold, wet, gritty truth behind the famous pay gap.
# Watch video
Slow motion of the day.